Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Based on 2486 Simplified Chinese Steam reviews, analyzed on 2026-09-23.
These results describe the analyzed sample, not every Steam review. A small sample may miss other views.
What context is available for the review sample?
Subsamples include only recorded metadata. Recommended/not recommended refers to the author’s Steam recommendation, separate from model sentiment.
All analyzed reviews
390.2h average when reviewed
Subsample: 2486 reviews with recorded playtime.
This records playtime when the review was written, not later lifetime playtime.
Steam-recommended reviews
369.3h average when reviewed
Subsample: 1987 reviews with recorded playtime.
This records playtime when the review was written, not later lifetime playtime.
Steam-not-recommended reviews
473.3h average when reviewed
Subsample: 499 reviews with recorded playtime.
This records playtime when the review was written, not later lifetime playtime.
Marked as purchased on Steam: 100%
2486 of 2486 reviews with recorded purchase flags are marked as purchased on Steam.
What do reviewers praise and criticize?
Short phrases from the analyzed Chinese review text, grouped by positive and negative signals.
Positive signals
- 土豆 服务器
Negative signals
- 垃圾 服务器
- 闪退
What do Chinese reviewers say about this game?
Mentions are detected topic signals, not a count of unique players. Model sentiment is separate from the author’s Steam recommendation.
How do reviewers describe the gameplay?
Opinions about the play experience in the analyzed Chinese reviews.
Gameplay: positive model sentiment, based on 108 mentions.
Do reviewers report performance problems?
Reviewers describe their experience; these opinions are not FPS measurements or a hardware benchmark.
Performance: neutral model sentiment, based on 42 mentions. There is no clear positive or negative signal.
What do reviewers say about multiplayer?
Topic sentiment from the analyzed Chinese review text.
Multiplayer: negative model sentiment, based on 234 mentions.
What bugs do reviewers mention?
Reports of problems in the analyzed reviews, without a promise that they affect every player.
Bugs: negative model sentiment, based on 76 mentions.
What do reviewers say about difficulty?
Topic sentiment from the analyzed Chinese review text.
Difficulty: positive model sentiment, based on 60 mentions.
What do reviewers say about support?
Topic sentiment from the analyzed Chinese review text.
Support: negative model sentiment, based on 46 mentions.
What do reviewers say about stickiness?
Topic sentiment from the analyzed Chinese review text.
Stickiness: neutral model sentiment, based on 43 mentions. There is no clear positive or negative signal.
What do reviewers say about story?
Topic sentiment from the analyzed Chinese review text.
Story: positive model sentiment, based on 25 mentions.
What do reviewers say about controls?
Topic sentiment from the analyzed Chinese review text.
Controls: positive model sentiment, based on 22 mentions.
What do reviewers say about progression & grind?
Topic sentiment from the analyzed Chinese review text.
Progression & Grind: positive model sentiment, based on 22 mentions.
What do reviewers say about art & design?
Topic sentiment from the analyzed Chinese review text.
Art & Design: positive model sentiment, based on 18 mentions.
What do reviewers say about monetization?
Topic sentiment from the analyzed Chinese review text.
Monetization: neutral model sentiment, based on 17 mentions. There is no clear positive or negative signal.
What do reviewers say about graphics?
Topic sentiment from the analyzed Chinese review text.
Graphics: positive model sentiment, based on 14 mentions.
What do reviewers say about sound?
Topic sentiment from the analyzed Chinese review text.
Sound: positive model sentiment, based on 10 mentions.
What do reviewers say about content variety?
Topic sentiment from the analyzed Chinese review text.
Content Variety: positive model sentiment, based on 9 mentions.
What do reviewers say about ui?
Topic sentiment from the analyzed Chinese review text.
UI: negative model sentiment, based on 7 mentions.
Do reviewers think the price matches the experience?
Price-to-value opinions from the analyzed Chinese reviews, separate from the current price and from a product purchase recommendation.
Analyzed reviewers describe the game as worth its price. Based on 21 Value topic mentions; mentions are not unique players.
Do reviewers describe DLC as necessary?
Signals from Chinese reviews, separate from overall price-to-value; these are not a DLC inventory or a product purchase recommendation.
Evidence is insufficient or inconclusive on DLC dependency.
What do reviewers say about microtransactions?
Signals from Chinese reviews, separate from overall price-to-value; these are not a DLC inventory or a product purchase recommendation.
Evidence is insufficient or inconclusive on microtransactions.
There is not enough decisive review evidence; this does not mean paid content is absent.
What do reviewers report about playing on Steam Deck?
Based only on saved review information; this is not an FPS benchmark or a guarantee that the game runs on the device.
This saved review summary does not include an official Steam Deck compatibility classification. Review metadata is not a compatibility certification.
Available Steam Deck data is limited or missing.
Steam review metadata
0 analyzed reviews carry Steam’s primarily-on-Steam-Deck flag. Authors recommended 0 and did not recommend 0.
No usable Deck playtime-at-review data is available.
Steam Deck feedback in review text
1 analyzed review contains explicit Steam Deck text discussion. Text signals: 1 positive, 0 negative and 0 mixed.
Selected original Chinese examples, without translation; these are not every view.
why cant i play it on steamdeckWhat do Chinese reviewers report about Chinese language support?
Reviewer language experiences, separate from an official language listing or a new translation service. Limited evidence or mixed opinions do not establish whether official localization is present.
Not enough clear Chinese language support evidence for a confident verdict
No decisive review evidence is available.
Selected original Chinese review text. Original review links are not stored in this summary, so no source link is added.
No selected original Chinese language-support examples are available.
What is the community asking for?
Requests directed at developers in analyzed Chinese reviews from the last 30 days. They do not establish a developer roadmap, patch announcement or promise.
No clear community request agenda stands out in the current review evidence.
What is the CN price and saved price history?
Saved price context for the China (CN) market; it does not represent every market. Price collection and review analysis have separate dates.
Saved price: CNY 0.00; regular price: CNY 0.00; discount: 0%. Marked as free to play.
Price collected on 2026-10-17; source: Steam.
Showing 120 price points out of 120 valid saved points, from 2024-05-20 to 2026-10-17.
History last successfully synchronized on 2026-10-17.
Free to play now. The saved price history covers the earlier paid period.
What do reviewers say in their own words?
Selected original Chinese review fragments are examples, not every view or a game test by this site.
Art & Design
这种垂直攻防和场景破坏的为了网游化铺开，材质光影风格没有以前好看Bugs
成就弹窗爱好者必备sb游戏进都进不去Content Variety
持续的内容品较少，还是有很高的耐玩性Controls
根本玩不了，每天稳定触发手难度高还有死人强些手感Difficulty
真实硬核好玩，重点是免费虽然网上说这游戏很难上手Gameplay
匹配机制也恶心的不行手和零氪党来说太难太肝